The Be All and End All?

NOT[!] *
Nor,
Neither.

Not to trammel up the consequences,
but "Peace is hard work"
and so are economics and progress.
Not to catch up on the gaming metaphor either.

(See Tax Plan and "Fiscal Terrorism")
Not to mention actual tables.

[ T. O. W.]
Politics ---> Economics, Government, Religion (Values)
Philosophy -
Psychology -
Physics ---> Math, Meaning, Forces(Ge Oh Me Try)***

Leaving aside the dynamics of philosophy and psychology, the internal and external dynamics of thoughts and feelings should be noted.
Also note difference between theories and models,
not to mention** formulay.

* note irony puncutation [!] in regard to the INET dicussion of models in the context of "Moneyball" and the Bard.(next two links) But more importantly in the context of the Platonic system, which I call the Tetrahedron of Will(TOW).
** Or KOW TOW
*** not just to pun but physics is the base and politics the pinnacle in this GPS of whose will and what will happen.

[Update: 7-10-13 hilites added also labels(INET/The Last Word)

13 and a half men?

C-Birds
and 16 models of the 3-body /metadigms*

Non-live blogging of the Seahawks Game. 
A tip of the model to Frank 'n Warner Bros.
Homage to the 12th man and some odd plays or caws.

Final 9-27 Seahawks over Rams.

*some rough notes^ on the field of math^^

^ 12-30 two added (b.s.)(FP)
^^ one added
1-30-14 label added

Hi Ate Us

[updated 6-23-11 here and here]
[updated 6-22-11 below]

Escher On Edge
(8-29-10)
US in perspective?

(Obliquity?)
Follow up from Bib Leo File.(Interesting)

[Log-in prevented me from posting this comment (at INET...) which I save here.]
Michael your comment on "free market" and "freedom" begs definition. Words are often taken out of context or provide context, but my comment might be better framed as "problematic" or hitting the nail on the head. A "free market" will always be defined by some powers, and that does not imply that "freedom" exists. "Freedom" will always existed in the context of(relation to) other forces, market or no. This is not to provoke or confound, but may just be paraphrasing your intent, as I seem to find in your conclusion. The need for providing... an equation for the real world, or rather for economics which is yet to reflect the real world and thereby address the "myopia of share ownership". Hint to self: regards dymamics of "free market" regulating power. Back to the drawing board?[Now I just may review the interview and two comments before "provoking". Earlier, I caught the lede of a "related video" by a grad student about getting economists out into the real world, but I have been unable to find it @inet...]
[Provocative thought two: Companies should not be run in the interest of the owners. i.e. maximizing value for share holders Correlated provocation: what about the costs to the economy?]
[6-22-11(cont){italics above denote changes} PT1: There is no such thing as a "free market". Myth of "market objectivity". Myth2: "Free Trade does not make countries richer".]
[6-22-11 Comment submitted and extended here and here meanwhile regarding the golden rule .]

[Footnote on "Hi Ate" US i.e. Taleb and Kay (in the context of politics/economics being connected but having different objectives)] O K ? Navigational Models. Again, what is the point?]

i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy

[Post dated 7-12-12]
[7-19-12 Anachronistic Caution * ! ]

Tetra Heed Run?

Speaking of Tetras, not the fish.

(Not to mention NOW, "there, there". Romney Files.)

T for Bane or, E for Cain, Tr for Issa and A for Priebus? 

i.e. Raw Money the 5th Elephant or L-lament?

Re: the Tetra Heed Ron, the I Ron Knee of the BOron or MoRon?

Ne BO*Son re:Biden

Re: Paragons v. Paragones

Re: Models v. Meta4s

(Not exactly) Re: Caricatures and Labels

Re: NOW, Fiscal Cliff predictable B.S. 

Knot? To we' ve.

Note that the third image is my original in[!]tent or rather Platonic Tetra Heed Run[!]. 

[!]= sarcasm/satire paragon/paragone thing 

The top two tetrahedron are later labeling, but may also represent a die-caught-o'me,  

PER or PRE culture/environment-al. The web is inFable!    

FOOTNOTES PAGE DECEMBER 2013

Begun 12-3-13

12-1-13:(sc) math problem un4m~ulated. (NFRY)
12-2-13(cont.) Too Random... Righty? 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (the point ?)
[4 the record : 3 squared? ]
12-3-13: Parallel [!] un-Pink Floyd, He- /^\ , van-NO JOKE, ven-Rough Philosophy, Cry- / Star Chamber Revisited, river- / creek ? 

rtd 12-3-13

Retrieved from draft 12-13-13
State Theory <- heading // lede -> and duality // trinity/body  Headings and^ Leadership*. (dynamics)
  ^    of/or 8:  Snooze/Dream(4,6) *prof(it)C? (7,8) Bane or Right?  [Not to blog both ends against the middle.]
Don’t celebrate yet!: Why Boehner won’t really ditch the right-wing nutjobs. /  The Christian right wants civilization to collapse / (3/5) Head ~ Lead Paul Krugman: The GOP’s austerity agenda is winning / My critics have “income envy”: Ed Schultz unloads after backlash to his union quote 
Dual / nd: When will the media learn? Conservatives are not “centrists”! / 3 essential (and ignored) questions about Detroit’s bankruptcy  Try Ad of Caution?  (not fully read yet) (anachronistic construction) (duel conflation)~ (bc: bubble critics)  OW Hegel ~ Liebniz [!]
RTD


12-23-13 (4) A.  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications., B. What's good for the goose? Goose the gander! c. Snooze Alarm d. Tony Baloney e. WWW Wisconsin Lesson? f. We Need Ed  g, What's good for the goose...

12-27-13 
12-28-13 1 Was Wittgenstein Right? or behind [?^] 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 9  // 10 / 11
^ insert a - h
12-29-13 - Original 5 links.  A. Frank O File? B. Pi cAP Delta rOW(USC) C. 1. Inverse Reality?,  2.(i), 3. Fair and Balanced..., D. Wittgenstein , E. Re-Mix  ///
12-30  F.rough- 1. Punderous Ponderings , 2. State of Politics , 3. A Revolution? 4.Un-Exceptionalism 5.  , G.notes^ -1. 2.Heuristic Concurrence and  3.My Respects to Those who Celebrate. (re-search*) , H.math^^ - 1. Too Random... , 2., 3.Bury the lede?, 4. ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)] . *(under the case of not fully read yet, but back to math... why now 16?  too cubed by two? Speculation that the 5th perspective is from apart too pun? The three-body problem regards intitial circumstances from within or without. R 1st 3 models different than recently added.  The pow#r of i(V)?

A pause-itive thought.

Infinity.

If there is an infinity of time going forward and back, why not the now.
Well, the space-time "continuum" deals with that.

Then, I have three blogs.  They are not mine.  They are just called mine on my Blogspot dashboard.
I don't actually follow them.  They just happen to deal with material and what matters in a parallel way.
Example:

The GOP’s Purity Problem

Transparency: The battle is far from over

We Can Say It, But You Can’t

Now, speaking of dimentions ... [!]

BTW:  I am not conned by Darwin's God.  I've only begun to think and thread lede or ships. 

Models are the new frontier.  Reading is not fundamental.  Math is the bigger picture.

The Dems have a purity problem to, transparency is problematic and Darwin's God may be ironic.

6-10-16
Darned if this doesn't start out* with a wave equation, that is probably related to the geometry of a sphere.

* actually at 3:21

Niche

Where there is a why, there is a how.
The end does not justify the means.
Twilight of the models.
[I should leave this "as is", but I will continue a rant, (the link was only an after google.)]
Dennis Preager recently paraphrased Nietzsche, and G.W. Bush earlier refudiated* Machiavelli. If the end were to justify the means, what justifies the end? No pun on the variations of mean(etc.) but...[I hate to leave this rhetorical**, but...]

* actually?
** see "circular" in context(not to mention values/price/cost equations)

Loose Threads

Re:Models and labels ?

? link !

3 Body Chart

My intent is never to rub...or shake spear wrong.

 

Re: Mix

3-Body / citations / Intitute of Physics Belgrade / ...

A Rising Tide

doesn't lift boats* of boot straps.

*mixed metaphor aside more parsing later

1. false resolution of uncertainty

2. limits of mathematical models

3. reintroduction of context/multi-disciplinary

4. inseparable from political

[parsing begun, straps** still being reviewed]

** Ctrl F Marginal Revolutionaries(previous references The Economist)

*2 Robert Johnson (see labels: INET)

Hump Day?

To Re:view Page:
Original intent to retrace the War on Hillary[!] links.
Under RE:VIEWING we find: File for Facebook.(but that is a tangent)
So back to 12-2-14.  We find Culture*. Below that we find OW [!]
Then (FP1) parses the Greek. Under which I find a new anamoly.** [A Witt gen stein?]
Within FP! we have (FP2)
Under post-pyth we have more on Hillary.  Prior threads and Pythagorean work on the way.
That's the ticket. C. bad+press Other Greeks*** to Countdown. or un-Vienna Circle?
The Calculus of DOW or coneheads? (Jung, Euclid, Barlow), (Newton Liebniz Asimov), Dar Tan Ya?

But back to the parsing or back from the tangent.
~~~~
(FP1)
~~~~
 (Liebniz Dar Ching)
There is no plausible metaphilosophy. All is metaphysics. 
Wittgenstein/NewLieb/TOW: words, math, subjective  /* objective Larouche / Rand?

Manual Blog Search: Not Just ... a Pen Chant 4 Geo Metrics.
Exceptionalism and the Slippery Slope , I.Q.* (draft) , Gitmo or less. ,
 Reading In Progress[***], Full Read! ?,  Hume or boo , F'N 3
[Need to review labeling of photos, images, cartoons etc]

Is the rational, math or language? 
Is subjective/objective the real ManyKey'nIsm or classical economics?
C-Shelley ? Or pre- stein.

*asterisk in original (* R.I.P.)
** leave as anamoly of [scroll over unclickable]
***  need to adjust way point(that's the ticket)

(FN!) : Starting with the last insert.(*-5) = mics? in regards to the meta-plausible.
(*-9)@ ManyKey'nIsm we (b.s.)Tryunism for 3 links in 2 posts.
A bit more anachronistic(*-1) we are Frank 'n pre-cast[!] 'n loosing the thread with C-Shelley ?
Or Shilling Schiller [!] 

Four Models(~):

 

(~) models : Milo Mulligan / The message is the mess.  (~) Para-model

Penta-meta point ?
Geo-metrics [!] ? (~)





 /*  : (2-4-14) [ / ]=subjective+objective:(b.s.) link inserted also two selected from(fp3)